About 'nutrition wellness certification'|What’s a Wellness Coach Anyway
In 1946, results from American youth military recruitment physicals revealed many potential recruits suffered from undernourishment. As a result, government-funded school feeding programs were introduced (Hunter, 1998). Research has documented the value of starting each day with a good nutritious breakfast. Congress passed the School Breakfast Bill in 1966 to provide low-income children with a healthy meal before the school day began. As a result of school breakfast initiatives, studies have indicated better classroom performance when students eat breakfast (Bro, Shank, McLaughlin, & Williams, 1996). The National School Lunch Program serves approximately 4.8 billion meals per year; the 2001 fiscal budget was set at $10.7 billion to fund programs (King, 2000a). Proponents of the school meal program support the benefits the program has rendered. The Abell Foundation, in Baltimore, gathered data based on six public schools in the district to determine the effects of the new school breakfast program. The Foundation documented improvements in attendance, student morale, and attention span following the piloted program (American Teacher, 1998). The Madera Unified School District, in central California, is able to support over 90% of its 817 students with meals through the free/reduced lunch program (Sullivan, 1999). Budgets and costly new inspection rules are changing the face of school lunch programs and menu choices (King, 2000b). Some skeptics argue the free-lunch programs are open targets for parent and school district fraud, since districts are not required to verify parents' self-reporting of income. District funding is based on these results as well (Snell, 2001). Other skeptics suggest the experiences of food deprivation and poor nutrition result from environmental conditions such as violence, drug additions, and familial breakdown (Murphy et al., 1998). However, Federal free -lunch administrators argue that the worst that could happen, would be a kid gets a free meal (Snell, 2001). It is the opinion of the grant writer that there is no argument that every child should have the opportunity to have balanced, nutritious meals- throughout the day. Federal budgets support school breakfast and lunch programs. However, a school-wide dinner program pilot may offer the documentation needed for the nation to take a closer look at the meal planning needs of American youth. According to James, Rienzo, and Frazee (1996) the National School lunch Program (NSLP) and School Breakfast Program (SBP) serve as significant contributors to children's diets. Significance of Project: There lies an overwhelming need for better health measures for students (Johnson, 2001). The Community Childhood Hunger Identification Project (CCHIP) estimates about 8% of the nation's school-age children experience hunger each year (Murphy et al., 1998). The proposed dinner program will increase the knowledge and understanding of the detrimental nature of attending to the health, nutrition, and thus, the academic needs of American youth. For decades, findings have supported that a good breakfast improves academic performance; this realization boosts support for school breakfast programs (American Teacher, 1998). The National School Lunch Program alone serves over 27 million youth on a daily basis. Thus, the program provides at least one daily nutritional meal for over half of the nation's children living at or near the poverty level (Johnson, 2001). According to Snell (2001) the lunch program is designed to provide food to students who may otherwise go hungry. An estimated one in 10 children eats two of their daily meals at school (James et al., 1996). Free-lunch data serves as an indicator of a district's poverty level and is the means by which the district is linked to other local, state, and federal funding opportunities. The writer believes the likelihood that a school based dinner program will result in positive change is significantly probable. As Johnson (2001) states, nutrition programs ensure students can focus on learning instead of hunger. According to Bro et al. 1996 parents, in the past were more reliable food providers for their families. Changing family dynamics have parents dashing for work and children left to prepare their own meals, which many opt to skip. Therefore, the consequences of hunger interfere with the child's well being and learning. The free and assisted school lunch programs provide a general idea of the students in the school hailing from impoverished backgrounds. These students are generally at a cultural and educational disadvantage compared to their more affluent peers (Texas Monthly, 1996); therefore, students in the free and reduced lunch programs experience a negative relationship with academic achievement (Caldas & Bankston, 1997). There exists a vested importance in the outcomes that will be obtained if the program receives funding. Awarding this grant will assist in "equalizing the playing field". Students will be afforded the opportunity to receive daily nutritional allowances; hence, evenings may be devoted to homework preparation. As a result healthier youth will evolve- body, mind and soul. Project Services: Research and effective practices suggests elements essential to a successful school meal program. Effective school meal programs should provide the daily dietary guidelines mandated by the United States Department of Health and Human Services. The 1996-1997 requirements held schools responsible for providing at least one-third of the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) for essential nutritional values such as vitamins, calories, proteins, calcium and iron (Hunter, 1998). The population of participants targeted in this project is district students presently qualifying for the free/reduced lunch program. Although the program is hosted at the high school, participants from the district's schools, meeting the aforementioned criteria, are welcome to participate. This population will consist of a variety of male and female students, spanning a multitude of ethnicities, cultural backgrounds, socio-economic statuses, ages, and grade-levels. Program partners and collaborators will comprise the wealth of budgeted members carrying out the program functions. The main contributor will be the Miracle Food Manufacturing Company who is responsible for all program funding. Program personnel become partners with a vested interest in the participants' health and wellness. The roles of the program personnel are thoroughly disseminated in the Project Personnel section of the grant proposal. A host of strategies will be implemented to ensure a focused effort on student wellness and nutrition are achieved. The Program Dietitian will provide mini-lessons on topics ranging from food groups and servings, weekend meal planning, exercise, doctor or dental visits and check-ups, to disease prevention and intervention. The Program Manager will follow-up with planned activities to reinforce the daily lessons; opportunities to win coupons, grocery vouchers, and restaurant gift certificate will be awarded to the top students accurately completing the activities. Activities will be held following dinner, prior to student dismissal for home. The project will receive additional support from student, parent, and community volunteers. Students in the program are transported to the high school from their various school locations. The layover time before dinner will serve as homework and tutoring time. Students without homework will attend volunteer-hosted, educational activities or academic reinforcement sessions. Volunteers will assist program personnel in student dismissal and clean up. Project Personnel A collaborative effort is needed to ensure the successful implementation and conductivity of the Food For Thought Program. The following section will highlight the individuals who will work on the project and the requested qualifications each must entail; the number indicates the number of positions available for hire. The personnel are as follow: (1) Program Manager*- Individual applying for this position should possess no less than a bachelor level degree from an accredited college or university. A minimum of 3 years experience in any of the following fields: education, health/medical, human services, or social work. Supervisory experience is preferred. Individual must complete a district application, pass all drug and background checks, and provide at least 3 references. * The writer of this grant is written into the grant as the Program Manager. The writer of this grant possesses the requested qualifications (see appendix A) and would serve as a resource to all other first year participants in this pilot program. (1) Program Dietitian- Individual applying for this position should possess no less than a bachelor level degree from an accredited college or university. RN or LPN Certification is required, if a medical degree is not held by applicant. CPR certification is suggested. A minimum 3 years experience in the health and human services field. Transcript highlighting science, nutrition, and health-related coursework is mandatory. Individual must complete a district application, pass all drug and background checks, and provide at least 3 references. (3) Program Transportation Specialists- (Application will be forwarded to district's contracted bus company for selection). Individual must have a valid State, Class E (Chauffer) license. Individual may not have an excess of 3 points in moving violations on license. A minimum 2 years experience preferred. Individual must complete a district application, pass all drug and background checks, and provide at least 3 references. (6) Program Food Service Engineers- Individual must have documented experience in the food service industry. A minimum of 2 years experience is preferred, however negotiable, contingent on references' feedback. Individual must complete a district application, pass all drug and background checks, and provide at least 3 references. (1) Program Maintenance Engineer- Prior janitorial experience preferred. Individual must complete a district application, pass all drug and background checks, and provide at least 3 references. (+**) Program Volunteers- Individual must complete a district application, pass all drug and background checks, and provide at least 3 references. Volunteers with a desire to tutor, conduct educational activities or academic reinforcement sessions must provide a transcript documenting a minimum of one, full semester of coursework, with a C or better Grade Point Average. Individuals must also submit a minimum of 5 mini-lesson plans or activity summaries on any generic topic or theme based academic concept that can promote higher-order thinking, skill reinforcement, problem solving, or basic historic/environmental knowledge. ** No specific number of volunteers requested. All applicants with sincere intentions are encouraged to apply. Management Plan The writer of this grant proposes two goals to measure the effectiveness of the Food For Thought Program. Goal #1: The program will improve pupil nutrition. Objective #1: The Food For Thought Program will decrease the number of referrals to the school nurse, of student complaining of hunger pangs from the previous day, by 50% as compared to the prior year's referrals by June 7, 2002. Activities: A. Students will participate in participate in lessons and activities reinforcing healthy eating habits and behaviors. B. Students will keep track of daily food intake, food groups, and servings in a meal-planning journal. C. Students will demonstrate the skills to plan a healthy meal or make healthier food choices throughout the week, and on the weekends, as demonstrated through role-plays and observations. Goal #2: The program will improve student academic performance. Objective #2: The Food For Thought Program will increase the grades of 60% of the participants to passing grades as documented by grades and work samples by June 7, 2002. Activities: A. Students will complete and turn in at least 3 out of 5 weekly homework assignments as documented by grades and observation. B. Students will keep track of all assignments and projects on a daily planner, for Food For Thought Program personnel to check to verify homework. C. Students will attend each class at least 4 out of 5 sessions each week and make-up missed assignments as documented by attendance records. Each of the aforementioned personnel members has specific responsibilities to complete to have the desired outcomes met. The individuals are responsible for carrying out the duties as follows: Program Manager*- Individual: · will be responsible for supervising all other members of the program staff · will research and negotiate outside contracts with companies to supply resources, within the budget, not suppliable by Miracle Food Manufacturing Company · will make and adhere to a submitted budget for all personnel and supplies as documented · will collaborate with Program Dietitian to coordinate daily activities with daily lessons · will collaborate with Program Dietitian and Food Service Engineers to plan monthly meal calendar · will forward all necessary payroll paperwork to the Human Resources Department of Miracle Food Manufacturing Company for payment · will coordinate documentation of Program statistics for reporting and audit purposes (i.e. student grades, attendance, referrals, etc.) · will make sure dinner is served promptly at 5:00 p.m. and clean up and dismissal complete by 6:30 p.m. Program Dietitian- Individual: · will collaborate with Program Dietitian to coordinate daily lessons with daily activities · will conduct the daily mini-lessons on various topics centered on wellness and nutrition · will keep data (or obtain copies) on all nurse referrals for reporting purposes · will serve as nurse or emergency contact personnel as needed · will collaborate with Program Manager and Food Service Engineers to plan monthly meal calendar · will assist with clean-up and dismissal Program Transportation Specialist- Individual: · will devise the most sensible route based upon participant addresses · will pick-up participants form designated schools · will drop-off students to Program site · will transport students to designated stops at the conclusion of each Program day Program Food Service Engineers- Individuals: · will collaborate with Program Manager and Dietitian to plan monthly meal calendar · will prepare and serve daily dinner · will assist with clean-up Program Maintenance Engineer- · will unload supply truck as needed · will set-up and break-down food service area as needed · will change and discard trash daily · will stock and maintain cleaning supplies and report needed items to Program Manager for purchase and subtraction from budget · will sweep and mop floors daily · will assist with additional/special clean-up needs Program Volunteers- Individual: · will tutor and/or conduct educational activities or academic reinforcement sessions that promote higher-order thinking, skill reinforcement, problem solving, or basic historic/environmental knowledge · will complete a daily performance summary for each student worked with on any given day · will assist in bus dismissal · will assist with clean-up The writer of this grant is aware special situations and circumstances are inevitable. However, no major or minor milestones for accomplishing the project's goals are anticipated. Each personnel member is trusted to be an effective and efficient team member. Communication, professionalism, and patience will be stressed. Evaluation Plan Formative and summative evaluation standards provide feedback on program impact. The following formative approaches will be utilized: A. Questionnaires for parents, students, faculty, and community members; administered prior to, during, and after project, B. Observation of role plays, simulation activities, and journal reflections C. Pre/Post test scores on mini-lessons and reinforcement activities The following summative approaches to be rendered: A. Posttest data compare to baseline data B. Interviews C. Student follow-up (i.e. impact evaluation) At this time, formal, standardized assessment instruments are not anticipated. An outside agency, Dr. Stewart Consultation Services, Inc., meet the budget guidelines outlined in for the project. Additional Food For Thought Program feedback supplied in accordance with this organization. Parental consent must be obtained for student participation (see Appendix B). Data collected on each student will be compiled for report. The Program Manager, Dietitian, and volunteers will collect student data. Participating students report by using individual journals, meal planning records, and reflections. Collected project data will include: · questionnaires (teachers, parents, and students) · interviews · observations · student records (attendance, grades, and referrals) Current baseline information, compared to previous information, denotes changes in students' grades, nurse referrals, and social progress (see Appendix C). Adequacy of Resources Adequate resources to accomplish the goals of the Food For Thought Program are necessary. The submitted application budgets for the needed personnel. The District approved usage of the Martin Luther King, Jr. High School cafeteria; thus, location and equipment usage is secured. Whittington Paper Products Company, Tobias International Market, Frank's Meat Company, and the Copy & Supply Surplus Store supplies remaining budgeted resources not furnished by Miracle Food Manufacturing Company. References Bro, R., Shank, L., McLaughlin, T.F., & Williams, R. (1996). Effects of a breakfast program on on-task behaviors of vocational high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 111-115. Caldas, S., & Bankston, C. (1997). Effect of school population socioeconomic status on individual academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 269-277. Hunter, B. (1998). Revamping school meal programs. Consumer's Research Magazine, 81(11), 24-26. James, D., Rienzo, B., & Frazee, C. (1996). Using focus group interviews to understand school meal choices. The Journal of School Health, 66, 128-131. Johnson, E. (2001). Caucus chair asks for million more public school lunch programs. Jet, 100(19), 4. King, P. (2000a). ASFSA demands return of $500m in commodities for lunch program. Nation's Restaurant News, 34(9), 77. King, P. (2000b). Shortage of free beef for school blamed on new USDA safety rules. Nation's Restaurant News, 34(36), 1, 61. Our best schools. (1996). Texas Monthly, 24, 112-119. Murphy, M., Wehler, M.S., Pagano, M., Little, M., Kleinman, R., & Jellinek, M. (1998). Relationship between hunger and psychosocial functioning in low-income american children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 163-170. Snell, L. (2001). Free lunch. Reason, 33(4), 32-33. Sullivan, M. (1999). The making of a distinguished school. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 28(3), 3-35. When everybody eats, the benefits soar. (1998). American Teacher, 82(7), 2. |
Image of nutrition wellness certification
nutrition wellness certification Image 1
nutrition wellness certification Image 2
nutrition wellness certification Image 3
nutrition wellness certification Image 4
nutrition wellness certification Image 5
Related blog with nutrition wellness certification
- outoftherabbithole.wordpress.com/...program for anyone who is thinking of pursuing the AFPA Nutrition & Wellness Certification . The 3 stages that are graded: 200 Multiple Choice and True...
- fatburningexpress.blogspot.com/... to your health, wellness, and longevity. This program..., professional certifications, and all of the ...in the fields of nutrition and health. No other program...
- ireneross.wordpress.com/...NYC-based nutrition/wellness coach. She is a graduate of the Institute for Integrative Nutrition where she studied over... her board certification from the American Association of...
- beautythatmoves.typepad.com/beauty_that_moves/... with individuals or groups in a multi-month program of nutrition, lifestyle, and wellness counseling. Coaches are highly trained to support...
- ohsheglows.wordpress.com/...that the safety certification that the seller...more about the Nutrition and Wellness Specialist certification...trainer-nutrition-certifications-nutrition-wellness-consultant-certification...
- dynamicduowellness.wordpress.com/...dynamic duo indeed! Dynamic Duo Wellness is based in... customized nutritional counseling for ...they obtained their certification as Holistic Health ...
- inspiringradiance.blogspot.com/... my training, education and certification, IIN. In fact, the moment that I heard... ourselves in the area of nourishment/nutrition is not something we are familiar...
- jkristensen.wordpress.com/...part my ongoing personal development I am studying Integrative Nutrition in hope of broadening my knowledge in wellness so I can lead by example and share the benefits of this...
- successwarrior.typepad.com/... require personal trainers and fitness instructors to obtain certifications. There are numerous organizations that provide these ...
- binaryhealthcare.wordpress.com/... – field of health and wellness, which can run the gamut of healthcare, nutrition, exercise, holistic health and many...http://www.happtique.com/app-certification/ Share this: Share Email Print...
Related Video with nutrition wellness certification
nutrition wellness certification Video 1
nutrition wellness certification Video 2
nutrition wellness certification Video 3
0 개의 댓글:
댓글 쓰기